UECKE v. DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION


36 Wis.2d 530 (1967)

UECKE, Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 31, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by E. Weston Wood, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief by Thomas J. Donnelly, Jr., Samuel J. Recht, and John A. Hazelwood, attorneys, and Brady, Tyrrell, Cotter & Cutler of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Recht.


HANSEN, J.

The real issue is whether the terms of the option agreement effectively restricted the sale of the stock and hence the value thereof.

The position of the department is demonstrated by the following statements contained in a communication from the counsel for the department dated November 1, 1962:

"1. For Wisconsin income tax purposes there is no statutory distinction between `restricted stock options' and other stock options to employes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases