1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 533 (1967)
 

BAYSIDE v. BRUNER

33 Wis.2d 533 (1967)

VILLAGE OF BAYSIDE, Respondent, v. BRUNER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 31, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Schroeder, Gedlen & Riester, attorneys, and David B. Weber of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Martin B. Gedlen.

For the respondent there was a brief by Suel O. Arnold, attorney, and James P. O'Neill of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. O'Neill.

HEFFERNAN, J.

In general, the appellant contends that conviction for drunken driving, even though charged under a village ordinance, carries with it such opprobrium that the defendant should be entitled to the protection afforded in a criminal trial. Specifically, he contends that the jury should have been instructed that guilt could only be established by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant could not be called adversely by the village attorney, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases