STATE v. WILKAS


154 Conn. 407 (1967)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANIEL A. WILKAS

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 6, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred B. Rosnick, with whom, on the brief, was Allan H. Hertzmark, for the appellant (defendant).

Francis M. McDonald, deputy chief prosecuting attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Arnold Markle, chief prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).

KING, C. J., ALCORN, HOUSE, THIM and RYAN, Js.


ALCORN, J.

The defendant was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court of selling liquor to a minor in violation of § 30-86 of the General Statutes. The defendant did not testify, and the court charged the jury, as was then permissible, as to the circumstances which would permit an inference to be drawn from the failure of an accused person to testify. State v. Nelson, 139 Conn. 124, 127, 90 A.2d 157. No exception...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases