OCEANTOWN REALTY v. GREAT A & P TEA CO.


54 Misc.2d 502 (1967)

Oceantown Realty Corp., Plaintiff, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Defendant.

City Court of the City of Long Beach.

August 21, 1967


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Smith for plaintiff. Weisman, Celler, Allan, Spett & Sheinberg for defendant.


ABRAHAM SCHLISSEL, J.

Both parties hereto, agreeing that "there are no triable issues of fact", move for summary judgment in this action to recover additional rent payable under a tax increase clause.

It is true that defendant has somewhat hedged this concession by a conditional reliance on the rule of "practical construction". Since, however, defendant has agreed that this rule does not come into play unless the clause in question is first found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases