GROSSHANS v. RUEPING


36 Wis.2d 519 (1967)

GROSSHANS and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RUEPING, Defendant and Respondent:RUDOLPH and others, Impleaded Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 31, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Cross, Langer & Krainik of Baraboo, and oral argument by Clyde C. Cross.

For the respondent Paul R. Rueping there was a brief by Hill, Miller & Quale of Baraboo, and oral argument by James H. Hill.

For the respondents Merlin L. and Della M. Denzer, and Virgil and Velma Strait, there was a brief by Arthur, Tomlinson & Gillman of Madison, attorneys, and for Charles W. and Alta R. Rudolph by Hans O. Helland of Wisconsin Dells, attorney, and Ray A. Tomlinson and Bruce Gillman, both of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by Bruce Gillman.


HANLEY, J.

The Grosshanses and Rueping are adjoining landowners, and a dispute arises out of two conveyances by the common grantors, Virgil Strait and his wife. Prior to August 16, 1947, the Straits owned all of the land presently owned by the Grosshanses and Rueping, the description in their deed reading as follows:

"The North Half (N ½) of Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of Section Ten (10), Township Twelve (12) North, of Range Six (6) East, except a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases