April 5, 1967.
ORDER
Per Curiam:
In a proceeding under our Rule on Disciplinary Procedure for Attorneys, the respondent was charged with having forged the name of the Special Referee at the end of what purported to be his report in a divorce case, and with having forged the name of a Circuit Judge at the end of a decree in that case. After due notice a hearing was held before a panel of three members of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.