1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 265 F.Supp.
  5. 265 F.Supp. 279 (1967)
 

MORPUL, INC. v. CRESCENT HOSIERY MILLS

Civ. A. Nos. 3817-3821.

265 F.Supp. 279 (1967)

MORPUL, INC. v. CRESCENT HOSIERY MILLS. MORPUL, INC. v. TENNESSEE HOSIERY MILLS COMPANY, Inc. MORPUL, INC. v. D. C. McCONKEY t/a Allied Hosiery Mills. MORPUL, INC. v. R. B. EAST t/a Engleknit Hosiery Mills. MORPUL, INC. v. William P. CHESNUTT and Niota Textile Mills Co.

United States District Court E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

January 12, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McNeill Smith, John J. Dortch, David Rabin, Greensboro, N. C., U. L. McDonald, Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Harry Price, New York City, Richard P. Jahn, Chattanooga, Tenn., Kenneth D. Higgins, Athens, Tenn., for defendants.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FRANK W. WILSON, District Judge.

These five lawsuits arise under the patent laws of the United States and involve, among other matters, the validity and infringement of certain patents owned by the plaintiff, Morpul, Inc. The issues raised in each of the five cases, other than infringement, are substantially identical. The Court has accordingly consolidated the cases for trial. Even when consolidated, however, there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases