1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 155 N.W.2d
  5. 155 N.W.2d 384 (1967)
 

HEMMING v. ALD, INC.

No. 40502.

155 N.W.2d 384 (1967)

Carroll and Dorothy E. HEMMING and Paul V. and Carol Joyce Hemming, Respondents, v. ALD, INC., et al., Defendants, and Aid Inc., and Walter E. Heller & Co., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George P. Hoke and David W. Larson, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Vennum, Newhall, Ackman & Goetz, Melvin I. Orenstein and John H. Strothman, Minneapolis, for respondents.

OPINION

PETERSON, Justice.

Respondents purchased automatic laundry and dry-cleaning equipment from appellant Ald, Inc., on July 20, 1962, and rescinded the purchase agreement on June 25, 1963, on grounds of fraud.1 Respondents recovered, upon a jury verdict, all sums paid to appellants under the purchase agreement.

Three issues are presented upon appeal from the denial of appellants' post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases