1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 246 Or.
  5. 246 Or. 280 (1967)
 

STATE v. JENKINS

246 Or. 280 (1967)

424 P.2d 894

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT JENKINS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 15, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar D. Howlett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, J., Presiding, and O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and FORT, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding certain evidence.

No offer of proof was made and consequently, even if the evidence was admissible, we have no way of determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial to defendant.

The judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases