1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 34 Wis.2d
  5. 34 Wis.2d 491 (1967)
 

CHILLE v. HOWELL

34 Wis.2d 491 (1967)

CHILLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HOWELL, Defendant: GRIMSTAD and another, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 11, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by W. L. Jackman, attorney, and Hart, Kraege, Jackman & Wightman and John D. Thiel of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by W. L. Jackman.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Hugh F. Oldenburg of Madison.

BEILFUSS, J.

The defendants-appellants, Grimstad and his insurance carrier (the defendant Howell, although named as a respondent, has not appeared), contend that the trial court erred in that (1) it refused to grant a new trial in the interests of justice, and (2) in its application of the comparative-negligence statute.

At the close of the testimony counsel for Grimstad and his insurance carrier moved for directed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases