RADOSH v. SHIPSTAD


20 N.Y.2d 504 (1967)

Florence Radosh, Also Known as Florence Rae, Appellant, v. Eddie H. Shipstad et al., Doing Business as Ice Follies, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 2, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Cherney, Philip Elterman and Jerold L. Couture for appellant.

L. Reyner Samet for respondents.

Judges VAN VOORHIS, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL concur with Judge BURKE; Judge SCILEPPI dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion in which Chief Judge FULD concurs.


BURKE, J.

The central issue on this appeal is the viability of a defense to an action on an employment contract based upon the conceded illegality of a provision in plaintiff's employment contract allowing her employers, the defendants, to suspend her without pay and still claim the exclusive right to her services.

The plaintiff is a professional ice skater, apparently of considerable talent. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases