STATE v. PUTMAN

No. 56.

434 P.2d 77 (1967)

78 N.M. App. 552

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Haskel PUTMAN, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Rehearing Denied November 2, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Joel M. Carson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellant.

Foster Windham, Carlsbad, for appellee.


OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

By Count II of the information, defendant was accused of sodomy. The information was supplemented by a bill of particulars. The trial court sustained defendant's motion to quash on the ground that the acts alleged did not constitute sodomy. The State appeals under § 21-2-1(5) (4), N.M.S.A. 1953.

The crime of sodomy is defined in § 40A-9-6, N.M.S.A. 1953. The portion of the statute applicable here reads:

"Sodomy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases