1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 430 P.2d
  5. 430 P.2d 80 (1967)
 

COSPER v. HANCOCK

No. 21350.

430 P.2d 80 (1967)

Lee Roy COSPER and Jane Hyde Cosper, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Robert V. HANCOCK and Ivan Hancock, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, In Department.

July 17, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dilts & Hancock, George R. Buck, Jr., Robert R. Wilson, Cortez, for plaintiffs in error.

Marvin Ping, Cortez, for defendants in error.

PRINGLE, Justice.

This case arises out of a dispute concerning a purported contract for the sale of uranium mining claims in McKinley County, New Mexico. The plaintiffs in error will be referred to as the Cospers, and the defendants in error will be referred to as the Hancocks.

The Cospers are the owners of the mining claims which are the subject of this dispute. In the early months of 1962, the Hancocks contacted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases