1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 34 Wis.2d
  5. 34 Wis.2d 476 (1967)
 

GEYSO v. CUDAHY

34 Wis.2d 476 (1967)

GEYSO, Appellant, v. CITY OF CUDAHY and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 11, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Honeck, Mantyh Arndt of Milwaukee, and oral argument by William J. Mantyh.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Ray T. McCann of Milwaukee.

WILKIE, J.

Two issues are raised by this appeal:

1. Are ordinances creating and increasing a monthly expense allowance and increasing a monthly stenographic allowance null and void because the creation and increase of such allowances constitutes an increase in salary prohibited by sec. 62.09 (6) (b) and sec. 66.196, Stats.?

2. Can the city of Cudahy pay out such allowances if there are no itemized statements or vouchers submitted demonstrating that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases