NATIONAL BOWL-O-MAT CORPORATION v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 595-66.

264 F.Supp. 221 (1967)

NATIONAL BOWL-O-MAT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, Defendant and Counter-Claimant and Daniel Lieblich and Reuben Dankoff, Counter-Defendants.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

February 21, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stryker, Tams & Dill, Newark, N. J., for Brunswick Corporation, by John J. Monigan, Jr., Newark, N. J., Arthur C. Dwyer, Paterson, N. J., Stephen Knee, Springfield, N. J.

Lieblich & Cole, Paterson, N. J., for plaintiffs, by Malcolm A. Hoffmann, Patrick Leach, New York City.

Harry Green, Deal, N. J., for R. A. Dankoff.


On Motion To Dismiss Third Count of Counterclaim

OPINION

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

In this treble damage action under 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26, the defendant has counterclaimed against the plaintiffs and the counter-defendants in three counts. The first two counts of the Counterclaim invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under the same Federal statutory sections (1 and 2 of Title 15) as are relied upon by the plaintiffs to support jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases