1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 441 (1967)
 

DAHL v. ELLIS

35 Wis.2d 441 (1967)

DAHL, Appellant, v. ELLIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 6, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Crawford, Cirilli & Sullivan of Superior, and oral argument by Arthur A. Cirilli.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hughes, Anderson, Davis & Witkin, attorneys, and John P. Foley of counsel, all of Superior, and oral argument by Mr. Foley.

WILKIE, J.

The first issue presented on this appeal is what duty, if any, this pedestrian, walking on a highway in the left-hand lane, had of lookout to his rear.

Appellant contends that a pedestrian walking in the left-hand side of the road as sanctioned by statute has no duty to maintain a lookout to the rear.

In Mewhorter v. Integrity Mut. Casualty Co.1 our court discussed the specific problem, pertinent here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases