1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 274 F.Supp.
  5. 274 F.Supp. 200 (1967)
 

RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES

No. C-243-WS-66.

274 F.Supp. 200 (1967)

Clyde C. RANDOLPH, Jr., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. North Carolina, Winston-Salem Division.

Judgment Affirmed January 15, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., Renn Drumm, William G. Pfefferkorn and Jerry Dee Moize, Winston-Salem, N. C., for plaintiff.

William H. Murdock, U. S. Atty., and Richard M. Dailey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Greensboro, N. C., for defendant.

Before CRAVEN, Circuit Judge, and STANLEY, and GORDON, District Judges.

Judgment Affirmed January 15, 1968. See 88 S.Ct. 695.

PER CURIAM.

In this action an individual attorney attacks as unconstitutional the statutory and regulatory restrictions placed on the fees of attorneys representing claimants seeking social security benefits.

The plaintiff in his complaint filed December 16, 1966, seeks a declaratory judgment that 42 U.S.C. § 406(a)1 and the administrative regulation issued by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases