The order for a reference dated November 2, 1966 directed "a hearing on the issues both of the timely service of defendant's answer and the personal jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, and for final disposition of the motion".
The plaintiff has waived the objection that the answer was not timely served. The only other issue is as to the jurisdiction of the court over the person...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
