MORE v. SHOEMAKER

No. 8187.

427 P.2d 41 (1967)

77 N.M. 689

Robert L. MORE, Jr. and Ann More, his wife, Trustees, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Warren K. SHOEMAKER, Marshall Sellman and Dick Sellman, Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 1, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald A. Martinez, Las Vegas, for appellants.

Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & Harris, Frank H. Allen, Jr., Albuquerque, for appellees.


OPINION

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court dismissing appellants' complaint under the provisions of Rule 41(e) (§ 21-1-1 (41) (e), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp.), which provides that in any civil action, when it shall be made to appear to the court that the plaintiff has failed to take any action to bring such action to its final determination for a period of at least two years after the filing of said action, unless a written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases