WHITEFISH BAY v. WISCONSIN E. R. BOARD


34 Wis.2d 432 (1967)

VILLAGE OF WHITEFISH BAY, Appellant, v. WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 11, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Harry J. Hayes, village attorney, attorney, and Laurence E. Gooding, Jr., and Quarles, Herriott & Clemons of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Gooding.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Beatrice Lampert, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

A brief amicus curiae was filed by Goldberg, Previant Uelmen of Milwaukee, for Local Union No. 1486, affiliated with Dist. Council 48 of American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFL-CIO).

A brief amicus curiae was filed by Jean G. Setterholm, attorney, and Julian Bradbury, legal counsel, both of Madison, for the League of Wisconsin Municipalities.


BEILFUSS, J.

The following issues are presented in this appeal:

1. Does the WERB have exclusive jurisdiction to determine that the statutory conditions for fact-finding exist under sec. 111.70, Stats.?

2. Does the WERB have jurisdiction to determine whether a municipal ordinance is substantially in compliance with sec. 111.70, Stats.?

3. Is the Whitefish Bay Ordinance No. 833 in substantial compliance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases