SORREL v. HAIGHT

No. 38796.

71 Wn.2d 390 (1967)

429 P.2d 212

ORLY J. SORREL, Respondent, v. JOSEPHA HAIGHT, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

June 8, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur A. Giblin, for appellant.

Nicolai, Montgomery & Sorrel and Max R. Nicolai, for respondent.


LANGENBACH, J.

Respondent, an attorney, sued appellant, a former client, for the balance due on a promissory note.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that appellant failed to assign error to the entry of judgment (from which the notice of appeal was taken) and to the conclusions of law (which need not be set out in the brief, Kane v. Klos, 50 Wn.2d 778, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases