BUDA v. ROYAL NETHERLANDS SS CO.

No. 63 Civ. 386.

280 F.Supp. 180 (1967)

Tizio BUDA, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL NETHERLANDS SS CO., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 20, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Lassoff, Zimmerman & Zimmerman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Daniel J. Coughlin, New York City, for defendant.


MOTLEY, District Judge.

OPINION

On March 13, 1967, after a jury verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $10,500, defendant moved to set aside the verdict as being against the law, contrary to the facts and as being grossly excessive.

A different standard must be applied in deciding whether to set aside a verdict than in deciding whether to direct a verdict. In the case of the latter, the trial judge must permit the case to go to the jury if "there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases