TOWN OF RUSTON v. WINGARD

No. 38178.

70 Wn.2d 388 (1967)

423 P.2d 543

TOWN OF RUSTON, Respondent, v. LEO L. WINGARD, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

February 2, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo L. Wingard, pro se.

Binns, Petrich & Mason, by James J. Mason, for respondent.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant, acting as his own attorney,1 seeks relief in this appeal from two "orders on show cause," both based on purported violations of a permanent injunction issued March 18, 1963, at the instance of respondent, Town of Ruston. The injunction was not appealed from.

On February 17, 1965, an affidavit was filed alleging that appellant was in violation of the injunction. That same day, an order to show cause issued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases