TOWNSHIP OF BRICK v. SPIVAK


49 N.J. 400 (1967)

230 A.2d 503

TOWNSHIP OF BRICK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM SPIVAK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 12, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold A. Schuman argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Haines, Schuman & Butz, attorneys).

Mr. Ellsworth J. Sterner argued the cause for the respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion. Appellants' position depends upon the hypothesis that the Legislature in fact intended that a majority vote for three candidates shall result in the election of the next four candidates as well. We cannot be sure the Legislature so intended. We see no substantial constitutional issue.

No costs.

For affirmance — Chief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases