1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 246 Or.
  5. 246 Or. 203 (1967)
 

MAYS v. HULING BUICK CO.

246 Or. 203 (1967)

424 P.2d 679

MAYS, Appellant, v. HULING BUICK COMPANY ET AL, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 1, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael McClain, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Ringo, Walton & McClain, Corvallis.

Richard Bryson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Calkins & Bryson, Eugene.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and SLOAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

This is an action for an alleged "assault and battery." At the trial plaintiff presented evidence that she had purchased a car from defendant Huling Buick Company. Shortly after the purchase an employe of defendant Huling Buick, asked plaintiff to return to its place of business to correct a mistake in the contract of sale plaintiff had executed when she bought the car. Plaintiff did return. A disagreement resulted and plaintiff attempted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases