MAUK v. PHINNEY

Civ. A. No. 66-H-42.

280 F.Supp. 167 (1967)

George E. MAUK and Rosemary Mauk, Plaintiffs, v. R. L. PHINNEY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

November 1, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dougal C. Pope, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs.

Leonard B. Tatar, Tax Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:

HANNAY, District Judge.

Suit to recover federal income taxes and interest in the sum of $2,536.13 paid by Plaintiffs for the calendar years 1959, 1960, and 1961.

I.

The controversy concerns the tax deductibility of periodic payments made by a former husband to his divorced wife in pursuance of a property settlement agreement between them specifically relating to a substantial item of alleged community property.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases