CROSSLEY v. HARTMAN

[No. 713, September Term, 1966.]

248 Md. 196 (1967)

235 A.2d 743

CROSSLEY, ASSIGNEE, ET AL. v. HARTMAN, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 6, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent R. Groh for appellants.

Elwood E. Hauver, with whom were Wagaman, Wagaman, Meyers & Hauver on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J. and HORNEY, MARBURY, BARNES, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.


SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case comes before us on an agreed statement of facts, as permitted by Maryland Rule 828 g.1 If the appellants' brief contains a statement of facts which the appellees accept as accurate and sufficient, no evidence in appellants' appendix and no record references are necessary. Naughton v. Paul Jones & Co., 190 Md. 599, 59 A.2d 496 (1948).

For purposes of this opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases