1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 37 Wis.2d
  5. 37 Wis.2d 402 (1967)
 

WILLIAMS v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSP. CORP.

37 Wis.2d 402 (1967)

WILLIAMS, Special Administrator, and another, Respondents, v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 29, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Alan M. Clack of counsel, and oral argument by Nonald J. Lewis, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Godfrey, Trump & Davidson, attorneys, and Kneeland A. Godfrey and Thomas W. Godfrey of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Kneeland A. Godfrey.

HEFFERAN, J.

Does the evidence support the finding of defendant's negligence

The defendant's argument basically is that there could be no negligence when the jury found that the passengers had been discharged in a place of safety. It contends that when that duty had been discharged, it was absolved from further responsibility and that, as a matter of law, the bus operator could not be negligent in thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases