POLLOCK v. TIANO

Docket No. 29947.

253 Cal.App.2d 183 (1967)

61 Cal. Rptr. 235

BERNARD POLLOCK et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v. MIKE I. TIANO et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 3, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schumacher & Hale for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Robert Landon Kirste and Benjamin T. Adachi for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.


SHINN, J.*

Pollock and wife sued Tiano and wife for specific performance of a contract to sell plaintiffs a city lot. In a second cause of action plaintiffs sought damages in case specific performance could not be had. Defendants answered, alleging that plaintiffs had failed to perform terms of the agreement essential to entitle them to acquire the property and alleging that the agreement was procured by fraud. Defendants also filed a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases