SUTTON MUT. INS. CO. v. O'BRIEN

No. 5650.

108 N.H. 325 (1967)

SUTTON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. DOROTHY O'BRIEN & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided October 31, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell & Kennedy (Mr. Ernest L. Bell III orally), for the plaintiff.

Devine, Millimet, McDonough, Stahl & Branch (Mr. Shane Devine orally), for the defendant Dorothy O'Brien.

Batchelder & Murphy for the defendants Sawyer and John O'Brien, filed no brief.


DUNCAN, J.

The claim of error advanced by the defendant Dorothy O'Brien is that the Trial Court erred in finding that she did not have permission to use the vehicle. The argument in support of this contention is based upon the "relationship [of] the parties" (Standard &c. Ins. Co. v. Gore, 99 N.H. 277, 282) and the assertion that the evidence makes it "clear that Mrs. O'Brien...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases