1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 37 Wis.2d
  5. 37 Wis.2d 392 (1967)
 

STATE v. RICE

37 Wis.2d 392 (1967)

STATE, Respondent, v. RICE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by I. B. Shapiro and Murphy, Shapiro & Gorsky, attorneys, and Michael W. Hogan of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. I. B. Shapiro and Mr. Hogan.

For the respondent the cause was argued by E. Michael McCann, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

The defendant, in his brief, raises ten issues, several of them interrelated. Consideration has been given each of the arguments presented, however our attention will be direction to those which we consider to be determinative of the case.

(1). Venue as to first count.

Proof of venue on the charge relating to the "use" of a narcotic depends largely upon the admissibility of a statement by a state's witness, Oliver Leon Davis. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases