1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. Super. 329 (1967)
 

STATE v. FERRARA

95 N.J. Super. 329 (1967)

231 A.2d 224

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DANIEL FERRARA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 9, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James R. Zazzali argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Brendan T. Byrne, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney).

Mr. Harvey Weissbard argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Querques & Isles, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and LEONARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

The Essex County Court determined that defendant should be permitted to bring on a motion to suppress, pursuant to R.R. 3:2A-6, a confession and admissions allegedly obtained from him by certain law enforcement officers as the result of an illegal search of his person and automobile. State v. Ferrara, 92 N.J.Super. 549

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases