1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 272 F.Supp.
  5. 272 F.Supp. 148 (1967)
 

RICHLAND v. CHEATHAM

Nos. 66 Civ. 1300, 66 Civ. 1473, 66 Civ. 1695, 66 Civ. 1803, 66 Civ. 1849.

272 F.Supp. 148 (1967)

Sylvia RICHLAND and F. L. Salomon & Co., etc., Plaintiffs, v. Owen R. CHEATHAM et al., Defendants. Malcolm M. STULL and Marilyn Stull, Plaintiffs, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION et al., Defendants. Bernard S. SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff, v. Dorothy D. BROOKS et al., Defendants. Marvin SCHEIN, etc., Plaintiff, v. Dorothy D. BROOKS et al., Defendants. Betty K. WEINTRAUB, Plaintiff, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 27, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wolf, Popper, Ross, Wolf & Jones, New York City, for plaintiffs Richland et al. (Paul L. Ross and Donald N. Ruby, New York City, of counsel).

Stull & Stull, New York City, for plaintiffs Stull (Richard J. Stull, New York City, of counsel).

Milton Paulson, New York City, for plaintiff Schwartz.

Abraham I. Markowitz, New York City, for plaintiff Schein.

Harry B. Coran, New York City, for plaintiff Weintraub.

Shearman & Sterling, New York City, for defendant Georgia-Pacific Corporation (Robert L. Clare, Jr., and John E. Hoffman, Jr., New York City, of counsel).

Webster, Sheffield, Fleischmann, Hitchcock & Chrystie, New York City, for certain defendants (Manly Fleischmann and William L. D. Barrett, New York City, of counsel).

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for certain defendants (Marvin Schwartz, New York City, of counsel).

White & Case, New York City, for defendant Robert B. Pamplin (Edgar E. Barton and Konrad Knake, of counsel).

RYAN, District Judge.

We have before us a motion by defendants for an order determining that these five actions are not to be maintained as class actions because they do not meet the requirements of Rule 23(a) (4) or Rule 23(b) (3) and because the notice required under Rule 23(c) (2) cannot be given.

Specifically, defendants contend that the actions

(1) fail to meet the requirements that they will fairly and adequately protect the interest of the members...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases