1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 94 N.J.
  5. 94 N.J. Super. 319 (1967)
 

COX v. SANTORO

94 N.J. Super. 319 (1967)

228 A.2d 101

ELIZABETH JANE COX, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, CHARLES COX, AND CHARLES COX, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. MARION SANTORO, DONALD SANTORO, JOSEPH SANTORO, AND UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided March 10, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas T. Warshaw for plaintiffs (Mr. Seymour R. Kleinberg, attorney).

Mr. H. Curtis Meanor for defendants Utica Mutual Insurance Company and Joseph Santoro (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys).

FISHER, J.S.C.

This is an action for declaratory judgment to determine whether defendant, Utica Mutual Insurance Company, is liable under a contract of insurance issued to defendant Joseph Santoro. There are factual issues, but before they were reached the parties agreed to submit to this court the question of whether there is coverage on the face of the policy. To this end they entered into a stipulation of facts....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases