ABRAHAM v. ABRAHAM


248 Or. 163 (1967)

432 P.2d 797

ABRAHAM, Respondent, v. ABRAHAM, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified October 25, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl T. Huston, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Richard T. Kropp, Albany, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Willis, Kyle, Emmons & Kropp, Albany.

Before McALLISTER, Presiding Justice, and O'CONNELL and HOLMAN, Justices.


AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

HOLMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order modifying that portion of a divorce decree which required the husband to pay the wife $200 per month until she remarries. The provision was part of a property settlement agreement which was approved by the court.

1-3. The wife makes no contention that the provision of the property settlement agreement for the payment to her of monthly amounts was for other than alimony. The amount is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases