1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 9 Ohio
  5. 9 Ohio St. 2d 31 (1967)
 

SCHIFF v. CITY OF COLUMBUS

No. 40179.

9 Ohio St. 2d 31 (1967)

SCHIFF ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 18, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Frick & Volotini and Mr. Bruno E. Volotini, for appellees.

Mr. John C. Young, city attorney, Mr. Alba L. Whiteside and Miss Georgena Howell, for appellants.

TAFT, C. J.

Plaintiffs contend and the Court of Appeals found that plaintiffs' lots were not "bounding and abutting upon the improvement" of Livingston Avenue. In our opinion, it is not necessary to consider whether they were or were not. The contention, that they were not so bounding and abutting, was apparently made because both Section 727.01 (c), Revised Code, and Section 165 of the Columbus Charter limit use of the front-foot method of assessment to property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases