UNITED STATES v. VANTERPOOL

No. 417, Docket 31120.

377 F.2d 32 (1967)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joseph VANTERPOOL, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided May 5, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Leighton, New York City (Herman Blitz, Bronx, N. Y., on the brief), for appellant.

Max Wild, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, John S. Allee, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.


IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge.

The narrow issue presented by this appeal is whether the District Judge, who presided at appellant's first trial, exceeded his authority under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure when he set aside the jury's verdict and ordered a new trial for the appellant.

Joseph Vanterpool was indicted in March 1966 and charged with 2 sales of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174. His first trial was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases