1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 37 Wis.2d
  5. 37 Wis.2d 360 (1967)
 

LITTLETON v. LANGLOIS

37 Wis.2d 360 (1967)

LITTLETON, Respondent, v. LANGLOIS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Donald W. Kaatz of Madison.

For the respondent there was a brief by Ela, Christianson, Ela, Esch, Hart & Clark and Ronald J. Kotnik, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Kotnik.

HEFFERNAN, J.

We need not dwell upon the question of whether Mrs. Littleton was engaged in the improper practice of law in order to decide this case, for, in any event, we conclude that the judgment is binding and not void. The appellant has failed to convince this court that the limited function assumed by Mrs. Littleton in this case constituted the practice of law. The record shows that Mrs. Littleton did not purport to act as her husband's advocate:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases