ESPOSITO v. KLINGER

No. 21491.

381 F.2d 13 (1967)

John Anthony ESPOSITO, Appellant, v. John H. KLINGER et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

July 17, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Esposito, in pro. per., Donald S. Emmer, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant (argued).

Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., Stanton J. Price, Asst. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The final order of the district court of July 25, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it dismisses the complaint and the action as to the State of California. Also, this court agrees that Esposito was not entitled to a summary judgment.

However, this court is of the opinion that it is possible that the appellant (plaintiff) might be able to state a cause of action against the individual defendants if permitted to amend. Therefore, the district court should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases