SCHULENBURG v. SIGNATROL, INC.

No. 40166.

37 Ill.2d 352 (1967)

226 N.E.2d 624

EDWARD J. SCHULENBURG et al., Appellees, v. SIGNATROL, INC., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Opinion filed May 18, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

HORACE E. GUNN and WILLIAM R. KESLER, of Danville, and OWEN RALL, of Chicago, (GUNN, HICKMAN, KESLER & JENKINS, and PETERSON, LOWRY, RALL, BARBER & ROSS, of counsel,) for appellants.

ACTON, BALDWIN, BOOKWALTER & MEYER, of Danville, and HORACE A. YOUNG, of Chicago, (D.S. BALDWIN, of counsel,) for appellees.


Judgments affirmed.

Mr. JUSTICE WARD delivered the opinion of the court:

This case arises from this court's decision in Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc., 33 Ill.2d 379. It will be helpful to review briefly that matter in order to facilitate understanding of the issues presented here.

Time-O-Matic Corporation, a plaintiff, is engaged in the production and sale of flashers. A flasher is a device which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases