PEOPLE v. ZIMBARDO


21 N.Y.2d 15 (1967)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Zimbardo and Joseph Santini, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 6, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Aronstein for appellants.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Alan F. Scribner and H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges BERGAN and BREITEL concur with Judge BURKE; Judge SCILEPPI dissents and votes to affirm in a memorandum in which Judges VAN VOORHIS and KEATING concur.


BURKE, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether testimony as to the claimed direct observations of a police officer which in a pretrial hearing was found legally insufficient to establish probable cause for entry into the defendants' apartment and the seizure of policy slips therein may on their trial be admitted into evidence as the basis of convictions on charges of operating a policy business therein (former...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases