WIPFLI v. BEVER


37 Wis.2d 324 (1967)

WIPFLI, Appellant, v. BEVER and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 22, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by John W. Kelley and Roy T. Traynor, both of Wausau, and oral argument by Mr. Traynor.

For the respondents there was a brief by Smith, Harlow & Knab and Patrick J. Harlow, all of Manitowoc, and oral argument by Patrick J. Harlow.


CURRIE, C. J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether defendant Bever's bond issued to Clintonville is assignable. If it is, then Wipfli, as Clintonville's assignee, is entitled to foreclose the mortgage given to secure performance of the bond.

While the bond from Bever to Clintonville contained no language that it ran to Clintonville's assigns, the mortgage securing the same contained this clause:

"Provided always, and these presents are upon this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases