1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 278 F.Supp.
  5. 278 F.Supp. 76 (1967)
 

HUFF v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 25463.

278 F.Supp. 76 (1967)

Robert HUFF and Mary Holt, Plaintiffs, v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, and Albert Langtry, Jointly and Severally, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D.

December 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Bathey, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs.

A. H. Williams, Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy, and Jack H. Shuler, Alan R. Waterstone, Detroit, Mich., for defendants.

LEVIN, District Judge.

The question raised by the defendants' motion to dismiss is whether a telephone company and its agent have violated the federal wiretapping law, 47 U.S.C. § 605.

The plaintiffs, Robert Huff and Mary Holt, were employed by the defendant, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, as a mechanic and elevator supervisor respectively. A telephone of the usual type with a regular exchange number was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases