1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 36 Wis.2d
  5. 36 Wis.2d 312 (1967)
 

STATE v. PRATT

36 Wis.2d 312 (1967)

STATE, Respondent, v. PRATT, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 3, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Morrissy, Morrissy, Sweet & Stowe of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Lowell E. Sweet.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

BEILFUSS, J.

The defendant's contentions raised three issues:

1. That his wife's testimony should not have been admitted since it involved privileged communications.

2. That the testimony of Deputies Lentz, Galley and Polansky should not have been admitted on the basis of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 Sup. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, because defendant was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases