BRUNETT v. SLEZEWSKI


34 Wis.2d 313 (1967)

BRUNETTE and wife, Respondents, v. SLEZEWSKI, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 11, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Lontkowski & Lontkowski of Green Bay, and oral argument by Edward C. Lontkowski.

For the respondents there was a brief by Evrard, Evrard, Duffy, Holman & Faulds of Green Bay, and oral argument by John P. Duffy.


WILKIE, J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether there is credible evidence to sustain the jury's finding of damages to the plaintiffs in the amount of $4,000.

The trial court instructed that damage due to loss of mink be computed at market value of those mink which "would be demonstrated by the reasonable cost of replacing mink with comparable animals." Thus, the "replacement cost" was the measure of damages used by the jury. In our opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases