1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. Super. 249 (1967)
 

SLIWKA v. FRANKLIN TP. COUNCIL

95 N.J. Super. 249 (1967)

230 A.2d 537

STEVE SLIWKA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 6, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard A. Koerner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Skillman and Koerner, attorneys).

Mr. Stanley Cutler argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Rosenhouse & Cutler, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant township is governed by the provisions of the Faulkner Act, N.J.S.A. 40:69A-1 et seq., having adopted the form of government known as "Council-Manager Plan D." N.J.S.A. 40:69A-109 et seq.

The board of adjustment of the township, after a hearing, recommended to the township council that plaintiff's application for a use variance be granted. See N.J.S.A. 40:55-39 (d).

At the meeting of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases