1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 311 (1967)
 

MUELLER v. MIZIA

33 Wis.2d 311 (1967)

MUELLER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MIZIA, Defendant and Respondent: SCHULER, Appellant: POSANSKI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 3, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs and oral argument by Donald H. Mueller of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Nathan J. Rakita, attorney, and Jerome T. Safer and Albert R. Tadych of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Safer and Mr. Tadych.

HEFFERNAN, J.

Was the sale confirmed?

Much of appellant Mueller's argument is directed to a state of facts that does not exist. It would serve little purpose to clutter this opinion with a litany of his misconceptions. Suffice it to say that one premise upon which he bases his case—that the sale in question was confirmed and that the court set aside a confirmed sale— is without foundation in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases