RILEY, J., May 10, 1967.
The matter before us concerns the propriety of charging stenographic costs for a copy of the notes of testimony employed in a successful appeal and subsequently successful retrial. Upon appealing a refusal of plaintiffs' motion for new trial following an adverse verdict, the county paid for the original notes of testimony, as is usual in such cases. Plaintiffs contend that since they were required to print the record of the notes of testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
