IN RE ESTATE OF HURLBUT

No. 101.

238 A.2d 68 (1967)

In re ESTATE of Daniel C. HURLBUT.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Motion for Reargument Denied January 25, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ehrich & Mollica, Bennington, for Mrs. Daniel C. Hurlbut, widow appellant.

Eugene V. Clark, Bennington, for John N. Hurlbut and John N. Hurlbut as guardian for Suzanne and Daniel C. Hurlbut, II, appellants.

Ryan, Smith & Carbine, Rutland, for trustees under declaration of trust.

Williams & Witten, Bennington, for executors and trustees u/w of Daniel C. Hurlbut.

Before HOLDEN, C. J., and SHANGRAW, BARNEY, SMITH and KEYSER, JJ.


BARNEY, Justice.

Two questions, raised in a declaratory judgment proceeding, have been certified here by the probate court:

(1) Is the federal estate tax an expense of administration which must be deducted before computing the amount to which (the widow) is entitled? (2) Does the amount to which she is entitled include a pro rata portion of net probate income?

Both were answered in the affirmative below.

They arise in the context...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases