The respondent, admitted to practice on April 27, 1938, by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, was charged in seven specifications with unethical practices and professional misconduct. Following hearings held by a Referee appointed by this court, he reports that the following charges were sustained by the proofs, to wit: Charge No. 1, that the respondent failed for the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.